Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Blackwell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 16, 1928No. 6622PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

On the call of this case the plaintiff in error was unrepresented; and counsel for the defendant in error moved the court to open the record, and insisted on an affirmance of the judgment and an award of ten per cent, damages for delay.

The judgment of the court below is hereby affirmed (Civil Code, § 6249, rule 30); but the motion of counsel of the defendant in error for this court to open the record and award ten per cent, damages against the plaintiff in error for delay is denied, it not sufficiently appearing that the writ of error was sued out for delay only. This case differs from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Osborn & Walcott Mfg. Co. v. BlantonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Porter v. KolbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Brooks v. Proctor & HuddlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Collins v. Mobile Fruit & Trading Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bee v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Bee v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API