Legal Opinion

People v. Sibrian

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 2016No. A143369PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BANKE, J.—

Introduction

Defendant Henry Sibrian appeals from his conviction of resisting an officer in violation of Penal Code section 69. He contends the trial court erred, first, in allowing expert testimony on excessive force and, second, in precluding defense counsel from questioning one of the officers involved in his arrest about a pending civil lawsuit against the officer. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Shortly after 1:00 a.m. on October 21, 2013, Contra Costa County Sheriff Sergeant Joseph Buford observed defendant commit various traffic violations. As Buford turned…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lee Thompson, Administrator of the Estate of James Thompson and Paulette White-Thompson v. City of Chicago and Officer Bradley HespeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tiffany Tabares v. City of Huntington BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. People v. Reardon, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. A.B. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. A.B. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Ballesteros v. StekDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API