Legal Opinion
Ferraro v. Arthur M. Rosenberg Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 26, 1946No. 296PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CPIASE, Circuit Judge.
The appellant is a tailor who was employed as a fitter by the appellee, the Arthur M. Rosenberg Company, Inc., of New Haven, Conn., during the period from March 4, 1939 to November 5, 1942, inclusive. His duties required him to travel at times to work in cities outside of Connecticut and his hours of work were irregular. He was paid at first $35 per week. His weekly rate was increased $5 upon three occasions making it $50 at, and for some time before, the date his employment ended. He was paid only his regular weekly wages regardless of overtime.
He sued the appellee in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mobile Shipbuilding Co. v. Federal Bridge & Structural Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- Tallman v. LaddCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
3Cited by27 opinions
- Consolidated Masonry & Fireproofing, Inc. v. Wagman Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Security Mutual Casualty Company v. Century Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Warner v. City of Bay St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Cole Madsen v. A. J. Bumb, Receiver and Trustee for the Estate of Chase Capital Corporation, Dba Quail Valley Country Club, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Howard S. Lee, Eric Lee and Lester Lee v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.