Berks v. Oberpriller
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant seeks foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The trial court agreed with respondents, past and present owners of the property, that the lien was invalid because the improvements were not duly authorized by the owner of the vendor's interest to the property. The trial court further found that the lien failed because appellant served a lien statement only on a former contract for deed vendee. We reverse and remand for completion of foreclosure proceedings, concluding that the lien was valid and properly served.
PACTS
In the spring and fall of 1985 appellant made home…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Minnesota Wood Specialties, Inc. v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Nasseff v. SchoeneckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Gilbert Builders, Inc. v. Community Bank of DepereCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Anderson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.