Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Wright

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 2, 2005No. 2003-510-AppealPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The plaintiff in this case is a disgruntled former client, and the defendant is her former attorney. The plaintiff appeals from the Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in the defendant’s favor on statute of limitations grounds. We affirm on grounds that were alluded to but not entirely relied upon by the motion justice.

The substantive issues that lie in the background of this appeal are: (1) the applicability of one or more of our tolling statutes to the legal malpractice claim of a plaintiff who alleged that she was outside of the United States on some allegedly pertinent…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Perkins v. CrittendenTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Roth v. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Harris v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. Elizabeth Morel v. Stephen Napolitano, Alias in His Capacity as Treasurer for the City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  3. Mercurio v. the Zoning Board of Review, WcSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. Parker v. Banner SolutionsSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API