Legal Opinion
Neville v. American Barge Line Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 18, 1952No. 186PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, District Judge.
This is an action under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the libellant, Buelah L. Neville, as the result of the negligence of the respondent. The case was tried by the Court without a jury, and upon all the evidence, we make the following
Findings of Fact
1. On June 9, 1950, the libellant, Buelah L. Ñeville, was employed by the respondent as a laundress on the motor vessel “Trade Winds”.
2. ’ The respondent is a corporation having an office for the transaction of business in the City of Pittsburgh,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Armit v. LovelandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Roberts v. United Fisheries Vessels Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Beulah L. Neville and John W. Neville v. American Barge Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- James Sharp, Jr. v. Mrs. Mae Lucky, Registrar of Voters, Ouachita ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959