Martin E. Segal Co. v. Barton
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant John Barton (“Barton”) has moved to dismiss this diversity-based action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff Martin E. Segal Co. (“Segal”) alleges that Barton has sufficient contacts with New York to support jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR § 302(a)(1). The motion to dismiss is granted.
Facts
For the purposes of this motion, the facts will be accepted as alleged by Segal. See Hoffritz For Cutlery, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd., 763 F.2d 55 (2d Cir.1985). This case arises from Barton’s former employment with Se-gal and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Faherty v. FenderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Viacom International, Inc. v. Melvin Simon Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Production Group International, Inc. v. GoldmanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Agency Rent A Car System, Inc. v. Grand Rent A Car Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Agency Rent A Car System, Inc. v. Grand Rent A Car Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Lawrence Wisser and Co., Inc. v. Slender You, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988