Legal Opinion

United States v. Elliott

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided August 30, 1977No. CM 435475Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

COSTELLO, Judge:

Appellant was found guilty, contrary to his plea, of possession of 196 grams of hashish in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. He now asserts twofold error: that he was tried improperly because he was denied access to a witness he wanted for the proceedings on the sentence, and that the staff judge advocate misadvised the convening authority with respect to a trial ruling by the military judge. We find no error in the proceedings at trial, but there was error in the post-trial review.

The witness appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 United States of America v. Philip Zane, and Morton S. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. SeayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. DohleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. Murray L. Petersen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API