Legal Opinion

Noreast Fresh, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 27, 2000No. 98-P-1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C.J.

Noreast Fresh, Inc. (Noreast), a Massachusetts corporation, applied to the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) to be classified under G. L. c. 63, § 38C, as “engaged in manufacturing” for the 1995 tax year, a designation that would exempt its machinery from local property taxation. See G. L. c. 59, § 5, Sixteenth; Fernandes Super Mkts., Inc. v. State Tax Commn., 371 Mass. 318, 319 (1976); York Steak House Sys., Inc. v. Commissioner of Rev., 393 Mass. 424, 424-425 (1984). The commissioner refused, and on review under G. L. c. 58, § 2, the Appellate Tax Board (board), after an evidentiary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. County Commissioners of Carroll County v. B. F. Shriver Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
  5. Commissioner of Revenue v. Houghton Mifflin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Blue Line Distributing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Skechers USA, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API