Legal Opinion · Dissent

PPG Industries, Inc. v. Ashland Oil Co.-Thomas Petroleum Transit Division

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 29, 1978No. 78-1027Published

1DissentRosenn, Circuit Judge

This appeal involves the application of maritime legal principles to transportation of cargo on the Mississippi River. The focal point of the complex controversy between the shipper of the cargo, PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG”), and the several carriers is the topping incident at Lock 14 which caused the penetration of the antifreeze-laden hull of the barge REB-1602. Because I cannot agree with the majority’s rationales on the burden of proof, the enforceability of the insurance provisions, and the seaworthiness issues, I respectfully dissent.

In March of 1971, Ashland Oil Company—Thomas…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API