Legal Opinion

Georgia Vitrified Brick & Clay Co. v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1919No. 1006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Black (of the city court). Richmond superior court. May 16, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

A plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, not on the weakness of the title of his adversary. Powell on Actions for Land, § 130, and citations. Where a deed excepts from its provisions certain land as conveyed in a specified deed recited to have been formerly executed by the grantor to' another person, the grantee does not thereby acquire the .land so excepted; and in a suit by such grantee against such other person, to cancel the former deed and have the title to the land conveyed thereby decreed to be in the plaintiff, where the petition with the exhibits made a part thereof…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pich v. LankfordTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Wilson v. GerardMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Oldham v. FortnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Williams v. Thomas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Mendenhall v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API