Legal Opinion

Taian Ziyang Food Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 24, 2013No. Consol. 05-00399ErrataCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge:

In this consolidated action, the plaintiff Chinese producers and exporters of fresh garlic challenged the final results of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s ninth administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of China. See generally Taian Ziyang Food Co. v. United States, 33 CIT -, 637 F.Supp.2d 1093 (2009) (“Taian Ziyang I ”); Taian Ziyang Food Co. v. United States, 35 CIT -, 783 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2011) (“Taian Ziyang II”).

Taian Ziyang I analyzed each of the 10 issues that the plaintiff Chinese producers raised,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  2. Arcelormittal U.S. LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Ashley Furniture Indus., LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
  4. Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  5. Jinan Yipin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API