Legal Opinion

Worrall v. Moran

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 30, 1957No. 4525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The issue presented is whether tort actions can be maintained in behalf of the two unemancipated minor children against the administrator of their father’s estate. In the recent case of Levesque v. Levesque, 99 N. H. 147, we considered the question whether an unemancipated minor could sue his father and decided in accordance with the weight of authority that such an action was not maintainable. Id., 148, and authorities cited. In this connection it should also be noted that we stated that the “payment of money by the parent to the child” was by no means the sole determinant of the public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaker v. ShakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. Lasecki v. KabaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. HASTINGS BY HASTINGS v. HastingsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. HASTINGS BY HASTINGS v. HastingsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Worrall v. MoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API