Legal Opinion

United States v. Devins

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 8, 1978No. CM 436139Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before CLAUSEN, CARNE and COOK, Appellate Military Judges. CARNE, Senior Judge:

Appellant asserts prejudicial error in the disposition of his case by reason of the fact that he served 95 days in post-trial confinement awaiting the convening authority’s *499action in violation of the Court of Military-Appeals’ mandate in Dunlap.1

Appellant was tried on 18 February 1977, in Seoul, Korea. His trial defense counsel departed Korea on 1 March 1977, for rotation to a new assignment in the United States with an approved leave en-' route until 4 April 1977. Prior to his departure the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. VeilleuxU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. SchoolerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API