United States v. Devins
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Before CLAUSEN, CARNE and COOK, Appellate Military Judges. CARNE, Senior Judge:
Appellant asserts prejudicial error in the disposition of his case by reason of the fact that he served 95 days in post-trial confinement awaiting the convening authority’s *499action in violation of the Court of Military-Appeals’ mandate in Dunlap.1
Appellant was tried on 18 February 1977, in Seoul, Korea. His trial defense counsel departed Korea on 1 March 1977, for rotation to a new assignment in the United States with an approved leave en-' route until 4 April 1977. Prior to his departure the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. VeilleuxU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. SchoolerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.