Legal Opinion

Mocnik v. Mocnik

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 18, 1992No. 72658Published

1Opinion of the Court

838 P.2d 500 (1992)

Jack Johnny MOCNIK, Jr., Appellant/Cross Appellee,

v.

Barbara Ann MOCNIK, Appellee/Cross Appellant.

No. 72658.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 7, 1992.

As Corrected July 9 and 22, and August 18, 1992.

Sam P. Daniel, Jr., Doerner, Stuart, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, Richard B. Noulles, Gable & Gotwals, Tulsa, for appellant/cross appellee, Jack Johnny Mocnik, Jr.

C. Michael Zacharias, Rineer, Zacharias & Corbitt, Tulsa, for appellee/cross appellant, Barbara Ann Mocnik.

SUMMERS, Justice:

The primary legal question in this appeal is whether the goodwill of a medical practice is a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wilson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Kauger; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Wilson.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  4. Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Hanson v. HansonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API