Legal Opinion · Dissent

Town & Country Homecenter of Crawfordsville, Indiana, Inc. v. Woods

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2000No. 54A01-9903-CV-89Published

1Dissent

STATON, Sr. Judge,

dissenting

I dissent. A duty was created at the mortgage closing when National City Bank obtained knowledge of the money owed Town and Country for building materials. Where the relationship of the parties creates a justifiable reliance upon one of them and the circumstances are completely controlled by the party relied upon, a duty to use reasonable care exists.8 National City Bank as the mortgagee was experienced in making mortgage loans. Its closing agent, Tom Generis, had been advised by Fellows, the mortgagor, of his concerns that Town and Country had supplied building…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gariup Const. Co., Inc. v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. T.S.B. Ex Rel. Dant v. ClinardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. MaynardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API