Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland, Ohio v. City of Brook Park, Ohio
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 19, 1995No. 1:94CV0079PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
The City of Cleveland brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 against the City of Brook Park. Cleveland seeks a declaratory judgment that certain of Brook Park’s ordinances offend both the supremacy clause and the commerce clause of the United States Constitution, and an injunction against the enforcement of these ordinances. This Court’s jurisdiction is premised upon the federal questions presented. Both parties move for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, Brook Park’s motion for summary judgment is granted and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gustafson v. City of Lake AngelusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Trinidad v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- The CARROLL AIRPORT COMMISSION, Appellee, v. Loren W. DANNER and Pan Danner, Appellants.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- In Re Commercial AirfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- St. John's United Church of Christ v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.