Legal Opinion
State v. Schaeffer
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 5, 1992No. 05-91-01172-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Justice.
The State of Texas appeals from a trial court’s order that suppressed certain evidence in its driving-while-intoxicated (DWI) case against Scott Russell Schaeffer. In two points of error, the State claims that the trial court abused its discretion when it suppressed (1) the audio portion of appel-lee’s videotape and (2) the results of appel-lee’s breath test. We disagree. Accordingly, we overrule the points of error and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
Appellee was arrested for DWI and taken to the police station, where he was videotaped. During the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Turpin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Nickerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arnold v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
- Fidencio Vasquez v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Fidencio Vasquez v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Fidencio Vasquez v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Holly Kathleen Omahoney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.