Koch v. O'BRIEN
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The usual grounds for challenging interstate rendition are not involved in this habeas corpus proceeding. The plaintiff admits that he escaped from the South Carolina State Penitentiary, is a fugitive, and that the interstate rendition papers from South Carolina are correct and substantially charge a crime for which his return to that state is sought. Hinz v. Perkins, 97 N. H. 114; Bracco v. Wooster, 91 N. H. 413; Thomas v. O’Brien, 98 N. H. 111.
The plaintiff’s main contention is that his rendition to South Carolina would be a violation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Drew v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Sweeney v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- People Ex Rel. Barrett v. BartleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buffalo v. TanksleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Murray v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. FerrazzaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- People ex rel. Focarile v. GoordNew York Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.