Buffalo v. Tanksley
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
The sufficiency of extradition documents is the central issue in this habeas corpus proceeding. Arizona seeks extradition of Sam Buffalo to answer charges of rape and the commission of lewd and lascivious acts. We affirm the order which directs that the defendant be extradited.
On December 18, 1972, Sam Buffalo, while confined in the Colorado State Reformatory, was notified that a detainer had been lodged against him by the Arizona authorities. He acknowledged notice of the detainer on a form supplied by the reformatory but did not request a speedy trial or resolution of the charges, although…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Bryan v. ConnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- White v. LeachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- In Re the Matter of HartMontana Supreme Court · 1978
- Simmons v. LeachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. WimerColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wright v. Horse Creek RanchesColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.