Vance v. Ananich
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, J.
This case presents an issue of first impression in Michigan which involves whether a municipal ombudsman may subpoena witnesses to appear before him. In fact, the whole matter of ombudsmen is of relatively recent origin in Michigan. Nationally, "ombudsmania” in the United States, which is defined as the emerging and growing ombudsman phenomenon, is sometimes said to date from 1966,1 when Walter Gellhorn published his seminal works on the subject.2 In the broad sense, the ombudsman concept is said to spring from the question of how best to inquire fairly and quickly into asserted official…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SellMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Dooley v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Dawley v. Ingham Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Combs v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dibb v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Michigan Municipal Liability & Property Pool v. Muskegon County BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Anonymous v. Attorney Grievance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- (2002), Maryland Attorney General Reports2002
- Anonymous v. Attorney Grievance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.