Legal Opinion
Nayak v. Vance
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 13, 1978No. Civ. A. 78-856PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Dr. Nayak was born in Mangalore, India December 8, 1942 and came to this country in 1973 as an exchange visitor doctor. 1 Seema Nayak, his son, was born in Columbia in 1975. 2 The specified term of Dr. Nayak’s visit has expired. Exchange visitors such as Dr. Nayak are required to return to their native land for two years or work/reside in another foreign country for two years before they are eligible to apply for permanent residence in this country — unless this two-year foreign residence…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kent v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Schneider v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- TAYABJIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
- Al-Khayyal v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986