Philip Grove and Harriet Grove v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAUFMAN, Chief Judge:
We are called upon, once again, to wrestle with the tangled web that is the Internal Revenue Code and decipher the often intricate and ingenious strategies devised by taxpayers to minimize their tax burdens. We undertake this effort mindful that taxpayer ingenuity, although channelled into an effort to reduce or eliminate the incidence of taxation, is ground for neither legal nor moral opprobrium. As Learned Hand so eloquently stated, “any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helvering v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Leonard Greene and Joyce Greene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Rauenhorst v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
- United States v. Ingredient Technology Corporation, Formerly Known as Sucrest Corporation, and Robert M. RapaportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Palmer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Long Term Capital Holdings v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.