United States v. Ingredient Technology Corporation, Formerly Known as Sucrest Corporation, and Robert M. Rapaport
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is by a corporation and its former president from judgments of conviction for tax fraud by means of year-end LIFO (“last-in-first-out”) inventory overstatement. The principal arguments of both defendants before the jury in a trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert L. Carter, Judge, were that the inventory was not overstated because the corporation in fact had legal title on the year-end date to the property in question — raw sugar — even though it had previously agreed to resell it to its seller, and that in any…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Franklin Sanders v. William E. Freeman, Jr. And Charles BursonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. David Carpenter, Kenneth P. Felis, and R. Foster WinansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Federal Aviation Administration and United States of America v. M. Marshall Landy and International Aircraft Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. BershchanskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.