Legal Opinion
Sobel v. Board of Pharmacy
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 28, 1994No. 111-90; CA A68878Published
1Opinion of the Court
882 P.2d 606 (1994)
130 Or. App. 374
In the Matter of Jerome Sobel, Applicant.
Jerome SOBEL, Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PHARMACY, Respondent.
111-90; CA A68878.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted March 30, 1994.
Decided September 28, 1994.
Daniel Patrick Woram, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. Dean Taylor, Salem, filed the opening brief and Daniel Patrick Woram and Feldman & Woram, Portland, filed the supplemental briefs.
Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Bay v. State Board of EducationOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Cook v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.