Legal Opinion

Hamilton County Emergency Communications District v. BellSouth Telecommunications LLC

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2017No. Nos. 16-5149 through 16-5158Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1

CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART

2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · MooreKaren Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge

I concur with the majority opinion that there is an implied right of action under the 911 Law and that the Districts’ 911 Law and TFCA claims survive summary judgment. However, I write separately to dissent from section II.B of the majority opinion.

The root of my dissent is the axiom, acknowledged by the majority, that “the plaintiff is the master of the complaint and may proceed on its preferred cause of action.” See Majority Op. at 532; accord Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392, 107 S.Ct. 2425, 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987). Where I branch off…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Gordon v. Greenview Hospital, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Marshall v. Sevier CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Hamilton County Emergency Communications District v. BellSouth Telecommunications, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API