Legal Opinion
Clein v. Kapiloff
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 10, 1957No. 19719PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
The bill of exceptions assigns error on orders overruling general demurrers to an equitable petition, and granting an interlocutory injunction.
The petition of Harry Kapiloff and Sam Turetsky sought to restrain the defendant Sidney A. Clein from engaging in the retail clothing business in violation of a restrictive convenant entered into by the defendant Clein and other named defendants with the plaintiffs. In substance, the petition alleged: that the plaintiffs, prior to August 28, 1950, owned and controlled Macey’s, Inc., a corporation engaged in the retail jewelry business…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Griffin v. VandegriffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. SFR, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Webster v. Star Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Paul Robinson, Inc. v. HaegeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Overhead Door Corp. v. NathansonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1968
- Electrical Distributors, Inc., Also Known as Edi, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Sfr, Inc., Qed, Inc., Defendants-Counterclaimants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross Steven R. Heaps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee v. Ronald Mitchell and B. Jon Mitchell, Third Party Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.