Legal Opinion

Conway v. Kaupp

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaley, J.

The only issue involved herein under the stipulated facts is whether the action was barred by limitation at the time of its commencement.

The summons herein Was delivered May 9, 1930, to the sheriff of Queens county. Such delivery extends the statute for an additional sixty days after the expiration of the time limited for the actual commencement of the action by personal service. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 17.) Personal service was made on July 9, 1930.

The order directing liquidation was made on April 5, 1923. Thereafter the report of the liquidator with an audit of the affairs of the company was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Casualty Co. of Am. (Rubin Claim)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Cary v. . KoernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Swing v. EngleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conway v. North Side Lumber Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1931
  2. Gillespie v. Du MondNew York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API