Gessler v. Colorado Common Cause
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Eid
117 I would largely affirm the court of appeals, but on a much narrower ground than the majority. The majority goes far beyond the court of appeals' opinion by holding that the Secretary may not issue a rule that deviates from the $200 limitation under any cireumstances. But Sempson holds that the Secretary must deviate from that rule in a certain category of cases (involving small-scale issue committees), and contemplates that a bright-line rule would govern such cases. Sampson v. Buescher, 625 F.3d 1247, 1261 (10th Cir.2010). Because the majority has removed the rulemaking option from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Romer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Nicholl v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Sampson v. BuescherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Catholic Health Initiatives v. CITY OF PUEBLO, DEPT. OF FINANCESupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.