Legal Opinion

Mœrchen v. Stoll

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from tlie Circuit Court for Manitowoc County. Plaintiff appealed from a judgment of the circuit court disallowing his claim against the estate of defendant’s intestate, for labor performed for the deceased. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

The plaintiff, as creditor of the estate of Ambrose Oschwald, presented a claim to the commissioners appointed under the statute to examine and adjust all demands against the deceased, for money which he had let the deceased have, and also for work and labor which he had rendered the deceased. The commissioners allowed the plaintiff $1,028 for money which he had loaned the deceased, and wholly disallowed the claim for work and labor. The administrator appealed from the decision of the commissioners allowing the money claim. The plaintiff took no appeal from their decision disallowing his…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Kusick v. KusickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Concepción Cosme v. MárquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
  4. Allen & Co. v. MaxwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Cosme v. MárquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API