Legal Opinion

Henderson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1954No. 18592PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. In ground 1 of the_ amended motion for new trial it is contended that the court erred in failing to charge the jury, without request, on the law of circumstantial evidence as set forth in Code §§ 38-102 and 38-109. It is insisted that all of the evidence adduced on the trial was circumstantial, and that it was mandatory on the court to charge the law of circumstantial evidence.

The witness Joe Beedles testified that he lived in the same apartment building with the defendant and the deceased, and that at about 1:30 or 2 o’clock in the morning, after the deceased had been…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Dolensek v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Northcutt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API