Legal Opinion

Harrison v. National Bank of Monmouth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 8, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Warren County; the Hon. John A. Gray, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

This was an action of assumpsit in the Circuit Court of Warren County on a promissory note given by F. O. Harrison and Allen Jones to O. T. Kimmel, who sold and indorsed it to the National Bank of Monmouth, plaintiff in the court below and appellee here. The suit was by the appellee as owner of the note against the makers and indorser under the act of 1895.

The trial, which was before the court without a jury, resulted in a finding and judgment for the amount of the note, against Harrison as maker and Kimmel as indorser. Harrison appeals.

It was stipulated that Harrison did not reside in Warren…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Italian-Swiss Agricultural Colony v. PeaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hamilton v. DeweyIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Herkimer v. SharpAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
  4. Oxman v. GarwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schenbeck v. First Nat. Bank of GrandfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API