Legal Opinion

Seizer v. Sessions

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1997No. 64156-1PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Two women, Rosalie (who resides in Texas) and Barbara (who resides in Washington), claim to be married to deceased lottery winner Elmer Sessions. The issue is whether Texas or Washington law should govern the action brought by Rosalie to recover any community property share she may have in the lottery winnings. The trial court granted Barbara’s motion for partial summary judgment, ruling Washington law governs, and dismissing the action because the suit is barred under Washington law. The Court of Appeals reversed, reinstated the action, and held Texas law governs. We reverse the Court of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re the Marriage of LandryWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Baffin Land Corp. v. MONTICELLO MOT. INN., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Erwin v. Cotter Health CentersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Seizer v. SessionsWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Carideo v. Dell, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API