Seizer v. Sessions
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Two women, Rosalie (who resides in Texas) and Barbara (who resides in Washington), claim to be married to deceased lottery winner Elmer Sessions. The issue is whether Texas or Washington law should govern the action brought by Rosalie to recover any community property share she may have in the lottery winnings. The trial court granted Barbara’s motion for partial summary judgment, ruling Washington law governs, and dismissing the action because the suit is barred under Washington law. The Court of Appeals reversed, reinstated the action, and held Texas law governs. We reverse the Court of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Johnson v. Spider Staging Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re the Marriage of LandryWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Baffin Land Corp. v. MONTICELLO MOT. INN., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Erwin v. Cotter Health CentersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Seizer v. SessionsWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Carideo v. Dell, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.