Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS.
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
When a natural gas pipeline company extends its facilities to a producing field, the resources committed to the field are uniquely valuable there; the pipeline is therefore dependent on the producers’ continued willingness to sell. By the same token, as gradual depletion of the field diminishes the producers’ bargaining power with alternative gas purchasers or transporters, the producers are dependent on the pipeline. The solution to this relation of mutual dependency is a long-term contract.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jersey Central Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Cities And Villages Of Bangor, Barron, Cadott, Cornell, Medford, Rice Lake, Spooner, Trempealeau, Westby, And Whitehall, Wisconsin v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991