Taylor v. Victor Equipment Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By THE COURT.
The appeal is from an order of the Common Pleas Court dismissing the cause and reciting that the Court had quashed the service of summons on the defendants and denied plaintiff’s motion to amend and correct the petition, summons and returns,' it appearing that the plaintiff could not plead further.
There were a number of procedural steps taken in the cause from the date of the filing of the petition, September 27,1947, until the final entry, but most of them are nofigermane to the question presented which is, whether or not the Court erred in quashing the service of-summons…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Inverarity v. StowellOregon Supreme Court · 1882
- Lyle Publishing Co. v. WrightOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Litsinger Sign Co. v. American Sign Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
- Hickman v. Hygrade Packing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Cook v. SearsOhio Court of Appeals · 1967