Ohio Division of Wildlife v. Kendrick
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} In 1993, Ronald L. Kendrick pleaded guilty to 35 hunting-related violations of the Revised Code. Nearly 15 years later, he filed a collateral attack on the portion of the trial court’s sentence that permanently revoked his right to obtain a hunting or fishing license. Kendrick contends that this portion of his sentence is void because under R.C. 1533.68, as it existed at the time of his arrest, the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to permanently revoke these licenses. We reluctantly agree. Under the holding in State v. Simpkins, 117 Ohio St.3d 420,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Dean v. UPS Legal Dept.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. FainOhio Court of Appeals · 2010