Legal Opinion
Arthur H. Richland Co. v. Morse
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 28, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 10515PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
This is a suit by an agent or broker to recover commissions earned by him in accordance with a contract made with the defendant for the sale of the latter’s great majority holdings (practically all) of the stock (8529 shares) of a Maryland corporation known as Maryland Electronic Manufacturing Company, the plant of which is situated at College Park, Maryland, a few miles from Washington, D. C. For brevity this corporation will be referred to as “Memco”.
After the stock had been satisfactorily sold to Litton Industries, Inc., a California corporation, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keener v. HarrodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
- Jones v. AdlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Steele v. SethCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Walker v. Baldwin & FrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- Livezy v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cowal v. HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Sanders v. DevereuxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Vanguard Telecommunications, Inc. v. Southern New England Telephone Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- William R. Morse v. Arthur H. Richland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959