Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nebraska Wesleyan University v. Luce Estate

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1940No. 30707Published

1DissentSimmons, C. J.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. Both plaintiff and defendant have claims which have been allowed against *853the Luce estate. Their proper allowance is not questioned. The estate is probably insolvent. Were it not, it is obvious this case would not be here. The majority opinion holds that the claim of the defendant is superior to the claim of the plaintiff, and that defendant’s claim (as well as all other allowed claims) must be paid in full before any payment can be made on plaintiff’s claim.

It must be remembered that this instrument was given in 1921. By the decision In re Estate of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nebraska Wesleyan University v. Estate of GriswoldNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Fremont Carriage Manufacturing Co. v. ThomsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Gaster v. Estate of GasterNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mieyr v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Paxton & Gallagher v. SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API