Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Eufaula City Court. Tried before Hon. E. M. Keils. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.

Prior to the Code, the term of the court was the limit within which the power of granting new trials could be exercised. 2 Brick. Dig. 276, § 3. The Code enlarges the power of the court in this respect, and authorizes a grant of rehearings in particular cases, on application properly made, after the close of the term at which final judgment was rendered. R. C. §§ 2812-28 ; Pratt & McKenzie v. Kiels & Sylvester, 28 Ala. 390 ; White v. Ryan & Martin, 31 Ala. 400.

The section of the Code under which this application is made provides, that if a party is prevented from making his defence by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Pratt v. KeilsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Pharr v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  4. Stewart v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. McBroom v. SommervilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1830

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Evans v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Hurt v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Ex parte CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Barron v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Collins Paving Co. v. HolseappleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API