In re the Estate of Hoh
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hetherington, S.
When a party to litigation having the burden of proof, fails to convince two different juries that his contention is right, how many more opportunities must be given so to do? Must he go on in the hope that ultimately some jury will be found to agree with him, meantime impeding probate in disagreement after disagreement? Is the other party to be subjected repeatedly, perhaps interminably, to the expense and inconvenience of resisting the claim? Contestants at bar raised the issues of undue influence and fraud in connection with the making of decedent’s will. It was for them to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Probate of the Will of KindbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to Be the Last Will & Testament of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Butler v. Supreme Council Catholic Benevolent LegionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of EnoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of McLuskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of HohAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933