Legal Opinion

Saxton v. Carey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*647OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In this action plaintiffs, who are citizeii-taxpayers, allege that the 1978-1979 State budget and accompanying appropriation bills as submitted by the Governor to the Legislature are unconstitutional on the ground that they do not comply with sections 1 through 4 of article VII of the State Constitution. Subsequent to the commencement of their action, plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction and defendants cross-moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action.

Special Term, relying upon the Court of Appeals’ decision in New York…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Wambat Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. SteingutNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Knickerbocker Field Club v. Site Selection BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo Urban Renewal Agency v. MoretonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Gruen v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Silver v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Capital District Regional Off-Track Betting Corp. v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Pataki v. New York State AssemblyNew York Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API