Legal Opinion

Sommers v. Sommers

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1966PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

There has been no appeal from the court’s determination of the mother’s unfitness to have custody of these children, and, therefore, no good purpose would be served in detailing her conduct which constituted the basis of the court’s finding. Suffice it to say that, at the time of the divorce, she was denied alimony in view of her association with another man. She was given custody of the two children by the judgment that was entered, on April 8, 1965. Although at the time of the hearing on divorce she stated that she was not pregnant, she has in the instant proceedings admitted that she gave…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wendland v. WendlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Larson v. LarsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Whitman v. WhitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Seelandt v. SeelandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dees v. DeesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Sporleder v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Ponsford v. CruteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Adoption of RandolphWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API