Legal Opinion
Suraci v. Mucktar
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 23, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lucy Billings, J.
At the conclusion of a hearing on April 25, 2000, in this commercial holdover proceeding, the court found that petitioner purchased the fixtures in respondent’s loft unit from the outgoing tenant in 1988 for fair market value. This purchase of interim multiple dwelling (IMD) unit improvements removed the unit from rent regulation. (Multiple Dwelling Law § 286 [6].)
If, however, a landlord is found to have committed harassment under the New York City Loft Board rules, the landlord “shall not be entitled to decontrol of or market rental for any IMD unit for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County Dollar Corp. v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Baxter v. Captain Crow Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1985
- Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Perlrose Realty Corp. v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Dundee Equity Corp. v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Missry v. EhlichCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003