Legal Opinion

William M. Reese and Catholeen Reese v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1980No. 78-1441PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

Taxpayers William M. Reese and Catholeen Reese appeal from a decision of the United States Tax Court, T.C.M. ¶ 76,275 (P-H 1976), which held, in part, that losses sustained by taxpayers upon the disposition of two properties were capital losses, rather than ordinary losses as claimed by taxpayers. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the Tax Court erred in holding that the losses were capital. We conclude that the Tax Court correctly characterized the losses and therefore affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue determined deficiencies in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Burnet v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Helvering v. HammelSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Helvering v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Fahs v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Green v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  2. Hitchins v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  3. Sealy Power, Ltd. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  5. Rawlin L. Stovall v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API