Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Issued to Thirteen Corporations. United States of America v. Richard Roe

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 15, 1985No. 85-1154PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Chief Judge:

The government appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Vincent L. Broderick, J., granting a motion to quash grand jury subpoenas duces tecum issued to thirteen corporations. The subpoenas called for the production of corporate records. Richard Roe 1 moved to quash on fifth amendment grounds. For the reasons stated below, the district court’s order must be reversed.

I

Pursuant to its investigation of possible tax evasion and other offenses, a grand jury in the Southern District issued subpoenas duces tecum to thirteen…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Grant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Gary Katz, Witness. Benjamin Jamil, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Madu, Edozie & Madu, P.C. v. Socketworks Ltd. NigeriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. In Re Two Grand Jury Subpoenae Duces Tecum Dated August 21Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API