Legal Opinion

Marks v. Culmer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an order of the district court of the first district retaxing costs. The facts are found in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

This cause was tried in the district court, and plaintiffs recovered a verdict and judgment against the defendants. An appeal was taken to this court, and the cause was reversed and remanded and a new trial ordered. After the case was sent back to the lower court, the defendants filed therein their bill of costs incurred on said appeal, containing, among other items, the following, viz.: Paid stenographer, for making transcript of evidence below, $226; printing record, 161 pages, $2.10, $338.10; printing brief, 14 pages, $15; attorney fee, $20. On motion of plaintiffs' counsel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API