Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanback

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided May 2, 2019No. Case No. 5:02-CR-30020-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael F. Urbanski, Chief United States District Judge

Kelly George Stanback, represented by counsel, filed a motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018. ECF No. 1449. He asks the court to reduce his current sentence of 248 months to time served. The government asserts that Stanback is ineligible for consideration of a reduction in his sentence, and in the alternative, that if he is eligible for consideration, a further reduction of his sentence is not warranted. The government suggests that the only *621relief to which Stanback is entitled is a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RoseDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. United States v. McKinneyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  3. Sumter v. USP-CanaanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API