Legal Opinion

Wildwood Trust Co. v. DeCorrevant

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 9, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

20 N.J. Super. 559 (1952)

90 A.2d 110

WILDWOOD TRUST COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

WILLIAM DeCORREVANT, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided July 9, 1952.

Mr. J. Peter Davidow for plaintiff.

Mr. Samuel M. Garfinkle for defendant.

HANEMAN, J.S.C.

Plaintiff herein seeks, by an action in the nature of an equitable assumpsit (Capraro v. Propati, 127 N.J. Eq. 419, (E. & A. 1940), to recover from the defendant certain monies paid to him as a result of the facts hereinafter set forth. The facts are as follows:

On or about December 28, 1949 Robert C. Howell, a real estate broker, trading…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Capraro v. PropatiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  2. Miller v. EiseleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Beninati v. HinchliffeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  4. McCrory Stores Corp. v. S. M. Braunstein, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  5. Winchell v. ClaytonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Lahoud v. Anthony & Sylvan Corp., Etc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2025
  2. John Lahoud v. Anthony & Sylvan Corp., Etc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API