Legal Opinion

United States v. Freedman & Slater, Inc.

United States Customs Court

Decided March 22, 1951No. 7974; Entry Nos. 704314; 704313PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This application for review of the decision and judgment of the trial court was filed under the provisions of 28 U. S. C. (1946 ed., Supp. Ill) § 2636 (a). The merchandise involved consists of two shipments of wet salted “frigorífico ” sound bull hides exported from Buenos Aires, Argentina, and entered at the port of New York. The hides covered by both appeals were entered at the unit invoice value of 78 Argentine pesos per 100 kilograms of weight, plus certain dutiable charges, as invoiced. These charges are not here in dispute. In appeal No. 171098-A the hides were appraised at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marriott v. BruneSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. The United States, in Error v. Horace Southmayd and Stephen C. SouthmaydSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. American Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Reiss v. MagoneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Freedman & Slater, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API