State v. Doerring
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — lion. Jno W. Wofford, Judge.- (1) The law regulating tire practice of dentistry in this State, and creating a State Boárd of Dental Examiners (Laws 1897, p. 166), is not unconstitutional and void because violative of that provision of the Constitution (sec. 28, art. 4) which requires that no bill shall have more than one subject.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — lion. Jno W. Wofford, Judge.- (1) The law regulating tire practice of dentistry in this State, and creating a State Boárd of Dental Examiners (Laws 1897, p. 166), is not unconstitutional and void because violative of that provision of the Constitution (sec. 28, art. 4) which requires that no bill shall have more than one subject. The courts of this, and all other States having a similar provision in their Constitution, uniformly hold that all that is required to satisfy this provision of the Constitution is that the provisions of a statute shall be…
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
This cause is here on appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction in the criminal court of Jackson county, Missouri, at Kansas City, for practicing dentistry without being a duly and legally registered dentist and without a license therefor and without any other legal authority so to do. The information in this cause was filed by the prosecuting attorney of Jackson county on the 28th day of December, 1903. Omitting formal parts the offense was thus charged:
“Now comes Roland Hughes, prosecuting attorney for the State of Missouri, in and for the body of the county of Jackson, and upon…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. MeadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. RansonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- City of St. Louis v. TiefelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State ex rel. Evans v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- State v. DeGroatSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Moler v. WhismanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Smythe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- State ex rel. Clark v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.